summary2009

Match results in the table cells show the home team's score followed by the away team's score. The home team is listed in the left hand column; the away team is listed in the column subheading for each of the three divisions.

Players' Scores and Average Grades for 2009-2010

The table lists all players in descending order of achieved average grade (that is performance for the whole of the season) who have played a minimum of 3 games and who have an achieved average grade greater than 60.

Club	ECFRef	Player	Grade	Games	Points	Percentage Score	Current Performance
Denton	241589G	Jaunooby, Ali Reza	199	13	9.5	73.1%	213
High Peak	155778G	Shaw, Robert	197	10	7	70.0%	208
Stockport	113216H	Hulmes, David I	211	11	7	63.6%	203
Stockport	117777B	Reeve, Andy K	188	12	8	66.7%	197
Chorlton	194001G	Owen, Dennis	168	11	10.5	95.5%	196
Holmes Chapel	106612C	Bennett, Patrick J	174	11	9	81.8%	192
Stockport	106435G	Beach, Richard A	197	12	7	58.3%	192
Holmes Chapel	186957H	Hancock, Michael L	170	11	10	90.9%	188
Holmes Chapel	160594L	Blackburn, Jonathan LB	196	8	3	37.5%	187
Chorlton	116338D	Nurse, Richard	149	3	3	100.0%	186
Altrincham	129503C	Lockett, Karl	158	6	6	100.0%	186
Holmes Chapel	120687E	Turner, John M	175	12	8.5	70.8%	186
Chorlton	164919L	Murphy, James A	172	7	6	85.7%	185
Denton		Entwistle, Anthony		13	10.5	80.8%	182
Denton	120512C	Toole, Dave	156	14	9	64.3%	179
Holmes Chapel	108416B	Clark, Robert G	177	9	5.5	61.1%	178
Macclesfield	119406K	Soames, Anthony R	170	13	8.5	65.4%	177
Bramhall	253298A	Wei, James	160	12	8	66.7%	177
Stockport	231426F	Mason, Jeff	145	8	5.5	68.8%	174
Stockport	171318J	Tunstall, Mike J	162	13	9	69.2%	173
Stockport	161371G	Murray, Stuart R	173	14	8.5	60.7%	172
Wilmslow	267643G	Shepherd, Steven	150	12	10	83.3%	172
Chorlton	112997B	Horner, John E	170	4	3	75.0%	172
East Cheshire	190315K	Reed, John	169	6	2	33.3%	169
Altrincham	114623D	Lowe, Nick	149	4	4	100.0%	169
High Peak	109786G	Doney, Ron A	158	10	5.5	55.0%	168
High Peak	247263G	Olsson, Martin	177	9	4	44.4%	167
High Peak	230002D	Gartside, Carl	146	10	6.5	65.0%	166
Stockport	120145B	Taylor, Mike	175	12	5.5	45.8%	165
Marple	231423L	Kirby, Paul	173	5	3	60.0%	165
Chorlton	120826D	Vassiliou, Chris	176	8	5	62.5%	165
High Peak	152057L	Rout, John	158	10	5.5	55.0%	162
Denton	157128L	Cawley, Paul F	161	14	7	50.0%	162
Marple	120612G	Trueman, Glenn	167	8	5	62.5%	161
Stockport	100035E	Barber, Jill	155	12	6.5	54.2%	160
Marple	166350B	Oates, Ian	141	3	3	100.0%	160
Chorlton	127547B	Kierman, Dave	143	4	3.5	87.5%	159
East Cheshire	122336H	Ball, Graham J	160	8	2.5	31.3%	159
East Cheshire	112575J	Hewitt, Sean D	165	8	2	25.0%	158
Stockport	186643G	Sheppard, Daniel C	160	11	5	45.5%	157
Stockport	108552K	Coe, Andy Laurence	155	10	6.5	65.0%	157
Macclesfield	194731L	Cattermole, Philip J	159	12	7	58.3%	154
Macclesfield	108127F	Caulkett, Peter WR	144	10	7	70.0%	153
Stockport	247173F	King, Peter	146	9	4.5	50.0%	152
Macclesfield	194185K	Jouannet, Marc	127	13	8	61.5%	151
Macclesfield	118990G	Sime, Alan	122	7	5	71.4%	151
Stockport	166322H	Crowther, Michael P	150	11	7	63.6%	151
East Cheshire	165740K	Ramsey, Philip	159	11	4	36.4%	151
Chorlton	106649D	Beresford, Alan	159	13	9	69.2%	151
Stockport	157151F	Pardoe, David	151	11	5.5	50.0%	151
Marple	260129B	Lowndes, Andrew	143	6	3.5	58.3%	149
Bramhall	269332L	John, Tom	148	12	5	41.7%	149
Altrincham	186598F	Linke, Kurt	136	10	7.5	75.0%	147
Macclesfield	108672J	Colville, Philip J	138	9	4.5	50.0%	147
Macclesfield	114116J	Laurence, Geoff	164	11	6	54.5%	146
Marple	186675J	Cowling, Terry	136	11	6.5	59.1%	145
Marple	113601L	Jenkins, J Andy	152	12	6	50.0%	145
Macclesfield	253291J	Pomeroy, Raymond J	131	9	4.5	50.0%	144
Holmes Chapel	106389D	Bates, Ian	172	10	4	40.0%	143
Stockport	254540J	Smith, Len	134	5	3.5	70.0%	143
High Peak		Renshaw, Michael		4	2.5	62.5%	143
Stockport	181426G	Burns, Martin J	170	13	5	38.5%	143
Stockport	120163D	Taylor, Peter H	141	8	4	50.0%	143
East Cheshire	222005C	Taylor, David R	130	16	8.5	53.1%	142
Stockport	259539E	McNulty, Mark	144	18	8.5	47.2%	141
Denton	114717B	Lysons, John SM	162	11	3.5	31.8%	140
Chorlton	165707A	Peim, Martin D	149	5	2.5	50.0%	140
East Cheshire	133616C	Holton, Keven R	143	19	7	36.8%	140
Stockport	164044G	Rush, Steven J	130	6	4.5	75.0%	140
East Cheshire	904269G	Broadbent, David	139	18	7	38.9%	140
Altrincham	254532K	Hughes, David A	124	12	9.5	79.2%	139
High Peak	119081H	Sizeland, Chris M	144	6	2.5	41.7%	139
Altrincham	265134J	McNulty, Callum D	118	3	2.5	83.3%	138
Altrincham	260144J	Tomkins, Tom	133	6	3.5	58.3%	137
Urmston	251131K	Johnston, Keith	127	8	5	62.5%	136
Urmston	143161E	Royle, Joe W	141	6	2.5	41.7%	135
Urmston	186664D	Davis, Mark	138	4	1.5	37.5%	134
Stockport	118336K	Rushworth, Vic J	133	14	8	57.1%	133
Chorlton	234753C	Brusby, Ian	145	3	2	66.7%	133
Macclesfield	265138F	Kumar, Vijay	141	12	4.5	37.5%	133
East Cheshire	180149B	Bamford, Paul	133	10	4.5	45.0%	132
East Cheshire	263459E	Stokes, Alan	129	17	7.5	44.1%	131
Holmes Chapel	118034E	Roberts, Malcolm A	138	6	2.5	41.7%	131
Marple	109823J	Doust, Anthony	116	14	7	50.0%	130
Macclesfield	133635G	Lobo, Denzil P	148	6	2.5	41.7%	129
Bramhall	185583K	Flaherty, Nicholas C	133	8	2.5	31.3%	129
Macclesfield	100498A	Murphy, Richard LW	123	8	3.5	43.8%	128
Denton	273804B	Holt, David	135	14	5	35.7%	128
Macclesfield	273799B	Berenbrinck, Richard	131	7	2	28.6%	127
Wilmslow	192317B	Jones, Darren	123	9	5.5	61.1%	126
Wilmslow	222918D	Flynn, Anthony	93	14	9.5	67.9%	126
Wilmslow	222917B	Guffogg, Christopher J	130	19	9.5	50.0%	125
Bramhall	152863E	Murfin, Chris D	133	10	2.5	25.0%	121
Stockport	263943K	Kelly, John	141	19	7.5	39.5%	120
Bramhall	172309B	Thursfield, Peter		9	2.5	27.8%	120
Marple	143710A	Kelly, Peter H	107	7	3.5	50.0%	120
Stockport	117391B	Preen, David W	138	8	3.5	43.8%	120
Macclesfield	152059D	Brough, Anthony R	145	12	3	25.0%	119
Chorlton	154079J	Lee, Daniel T	165	4	1.5	37.5%	118
East Cheshire	108433B	Clarke, Geoffrey	117	20	7.5	37.5%	117
Bramhall	222909C	Hodgson, Keith	108	11	4	36.4%	116
East Cheshire	241473K	Rickards, Tudor	149	13	2	15.4%	115
Wilmslow		Booth, David		12	7.5	62.5%	115
Urmston	223218C	Morris, Thomas L	90	4	3	75.0%	114
Macclesfield		Katolo, Bubble		3	1	33.3%	114
Marple	120295K	Thomas, Trefor	119	13	3.5	26.9%	112
Urmston	256724G	Plunkett, Tim	108	13	5.5	42.3%	111
Wilmslow	247258C	Jackson, Chris	105	11	5.5	50.0%	111
East Cheshire	220005D	Vaughan, Ian R	103	5	2	40.0%	110
Stockport	260137A	Jackson, Marc	128	7	3	42.9%	109
Wilmslow	260132B	Palmer, Michael	124	16	6	37.5%	108
Marple	273798L	Barlow, Jeff	112	8	2.5	31.3%	107
Marple	152061B	Phillips, Roy	110	10	3.5	35.0%	107
East Cheshire		Tait, Bill		8	2	25.0%	106
Wilmslow	277377G	Thomas, Paul		11	8	72.7%	105
Marple	179078L	Sargeant, John	155	6	0.5	8.3%	105
Wilmslow	172310J	Warhurst, Robin	127	9	3	33.3%	104
Stockport	171828K	Anderson, Ian	111	10	5	50.0%	103
Macclesfield	127038C	Woodhall, Brian J	110	6	1.5	25.0%	102
Altrincham	247269H	Ward, Steven W	100	7	4	57.1%	99
Urmston	266383B	Parry, Andrew	95	9	3	33.3%	96
Bramhall	152874K	Oldham, N Hartley	118	8	1	12.5%	94
East Cheshire	278485D	Cunnane, Michael		15	3	20.0%	93
Macclesfield	277368F	Telford, Alex		5	1	20.0%	89
Urmston	251770L	Shaughnessy, Phillip	98	10	2.5	25.0%	85
Stockport	106715B	Biddulph, David	102	4	1.5	37.5%	85
Bramhall	108209H	Chandley, Duncan CW	95	4	0	0.0%	85
Stockport	107163E	Bradney, Ray F	69	8	4	50.0%	83
Marple	269575D	Wilcox, Peter	78	8	4.5	56.3%	81
Urmston	209411D	Thomas, Herbert	86	3	1.5	50.0%	78
Marple	269557B	Edwards, Barrie R	88	8	3	37.5%	73
Wilmslow	269559F	Garvin, Michael	87	4	1	25.0%	73
East Cheshire	269574B	Walker, Andrew	75	8	2	25.0%	69
Stockport	265141F	Prime, Anthony	103	4	1.5	37.5%	67

The "current average grade" (current performance) quoted on the Stockport League website is an unofficial one calculated on current results by me purely for players' interest. It has no ECF legality and should not be quoted outside the League. The next legal grading for each player will only be calculated by the ECF after the end of the current season and should be published about August .

The current average grade for each player that is on the Stockport League website is calculated by an Access database macro. The Grading Officer does not use the website grade in his submissions to the ECF which are completely independent of the website. His submissions are incorporated by the ECF into any other results that each of the Stockport League players has produced in other leagues, tournaments, etc.

Here is an explanation of the Stockport League website grades:
To do the calculations for the current average grade I need to have a grade from last season for every player. In the following I call this the 'lsgrade'. For most players in the League I have an official ECF grade and, for these players, this is the lsgrade. However, a number of players in the Stockport League do not have ECF grades from last season. In order to give such players and their opponents an idea of how well they are playing I have to assign a notional (entirely unofficial) lsgrade to each one of these ungraded players. At the end of the season I adjust the lsgrades of such players who have played 3 or more games to reflect their performance during the season.

The grading calculation in the Access database macro is as for the ECF grade calculation:
For every win I score the player's opponent's lsgrade plus 50; for every draw I score the player's opponent's lsgrade; for every loss I score the player's opponent's lsgrade minus 50.
The current grade is the average of such scores to date.

It is possible with this simple system to lose grading points even if you win a game because you are playing a much weaker opponent than yourself. Similarly, it is possible to gain grading points even if you lose a game because you are playing a much stronger opponent than yourself. For this reason the ECF system is modified and the Stockport League calculations also incorporate this modification.
If an opponent's lsgrade is more than 40 grading points below the player's lsgrade then it is assumed for grading purposes that his lsgrade is the player's grade less 40.
If an opponent's lsgrade is more than 40 grading points above the player's lsgrade then it is assumed for grading purposes that his lsgrade is the player's lsgrade plus 40.

Home team (below)	Denton	East Cheshire A	High Peak	Holmes Chapel	Stockport Blues	Stockport Reds
Denton		3.5 - 2.5	4 - 2	2 - 4	2.5 - 3.5	3 - 3
East Cheshire A	2.5 - 3.5		3 - 3	2 - 4	0 - 6	0.5 - 5.5
High Peak	4 - 2	3 - 3		3 - 3	3 - 3	4 - 2
Holmes Chapel	4.5 - 1.5	3.5 - 2.5	3.5 - 2.5		4 - 2	3.5 - 2.5
Stockport Blues	2.5 - 3.5	4.5 - 1.5	3 - 3	3 - 3		2.5 - 3.5
Stockport Reds	4 - 2	4.5 - 1.5	2.5 - 3.5	1.5 - 4.5	2.5 - 3.5

Home team (below)	Bramhall	Chorlton	East Cheshire B	Macclesfield A	Macclesfield B	Marple A	Stockport C
Bramhall		2 - 4	2.5 - 3.5	2.5 - 3.5	4 - 2	0 - 6	2 - 4
Chorlton	5.5 - .5		6 - 0	3.5 - 2.5	4.5 - 1.5	5.5 - .5	6 - 0
East Cheshire B	2 - 4	2 - 4		3 - 3	4 - 2	2 - 4	1 - 5
Macclesfield A	5 - 1	3 - 3	4.5 - 1.5		4.5 - 1.5	2.5 - 3.5	3 - 3
Macclesfield B	2 - 4	1 - 5	4 - 2	2 - 4		3 - 3	3 - 3
Marple A	4.5 - 1.5	2 - 4	3 - 3	2.5 - 3.5	4.5 - 1.5		4 - 2
Stockport C	3.5 - 2.5	1.5 - 4.5	4.5 - 1.5	4 - 2	2.5 - 3.5	0 - 6

Home team (below)	Altrincham	East Cheshire C	Marple B	Stockport D	Urmston	Wilmslow A	Wilmslow B
Altrincham		2.5 - 2.5	5 - 0	3 - 2	3 - 2	2.5 - 2.5	1.5 - 3.5
East Cheshire C	0.5 - 4.5		2 - 3	2 - 3	2.5 - 2.5	1.5 - 3.5	2 - 3
Marple B	0 - 5	2.5 - 2.5		1.5 - 3.5	2 - 3	1.5 - 3.5	2 - 3
Stockport D	2 - 3	3.5 - 1.5	3 - 2		3.5 - 1.5	2.5 - 2.5	1.5 - 3.5
Urmston	0 - 5	4.5 - .5	0 - 5	4 - 1		2 - 3	2 - 3
Wilmslow A	1.5 - 3.5	3 - 2	5 - 0	3.5 - 1.5	3 - 2		5 - 0
Wilmslow B	1 - 4	3.5 - 1.5	3 - 2	3.5 - 1.5	2.5 - 2.5	1 - 4

Stockport and District Chess League

Summary of Season 2009 - 2010

League Tables for 2009 - 2010

Cross Tables for 2009 - 2010

Players' Scores and Average Grades for 2009-2010

Div	Team	Matches	Points	PercP	AllGames	GamesScore	PercG
1	Holmes Chapel	10	18	90.0%	60	37.5	62.5%
1	Stockport Blues	10	11	55.0%	60	33.5	55.8%
1	High Peak	10	11	55.0%	60	31	51.7%
1	Stockport Reds	10	9	45.0%	60	31.5	52.5%
1	Denton	10	9	45.0%	60	27.5	45.8%
1	East Cheshire A	10	2	10.0%	60	19	31.7%